Jump to content

bachgaman

Members
  • Posts

    395
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bachgaman

  1. On 4/9/2022 at 8:29 AM, Blake_ said:

    @faatal, I have a bunch of questions  regarding bandits and npcs in general:

     

    1. Will they be able to jump? 

    2. Will they be able to place items, like 1-block barricades for flexible covering or will they just cover and stuff like that?

    3. Will they be able to drive vehicles/bikes? (I'm not sure if this one was already asked)

    4. Will they have the same pathing functionalities as Zds in the pathing department? ("1-block" and "1 and 1/2-block" pathing)

    5. Have you guys talked about dismemberment for npcs? If so, will they have it?

     

    6- Can we see a sexy  brand-new WIP screenshot of bandits in progress?

     

    Thank you very much for reading ! 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    i think

    1. yes, because zombies can

    2. no, because zombies can't

    3. no, because zombies can't

    4. yes, because zombies can

    5. yes, because zombies can

    6. yes, because zombies can

     

    bandits are zombies with other models and a ranged attack type

  2. 1 hour ago, Roland said:

     

    They are not going to abandon their roadmap just because some people want them to stop with what they have and increase the variety of existing things. They have just a few new features they want to include and then they will look at additional options, settings, items, recipes, etc that they desire. It never has been a choice of bandits or more existing stuff. We can have it all.

    Why abandon? Just postpone for another 7 years

  3. 5 minutes ago, Adam the Waster said:

    that kinda has me a bit worried, i hope that the TFP will do more then that. 

    Sense they want to go too console thats kind of a crappy attitude, Its one thing as modders too make/make/add stuff. hell some things modders do is better then the developers (Very few but the ones who do are well know for their craft)

    if they just kind of go. "ehh lets make them have zombie ai and call it a day" then thats not good

    i know we may have like 3 or more alphas too go but still a thing too think about for them. 

    in my opinion, it would be better if they polished everything that is in the game now instead of developing bandits, drones and other content that does not make this game more replayable. Instead of this cumbersome wow content, dozens and hundreds of items, recipes, world settings, perks, etc. could be added.

  4. 1 hour ago, Matt115 said:

    Yes , people here have ideas like change zombie into parasite or mutant worms.

     

    This is new content, I'm talking about working with what we have, not adding new models/mechanics/textures

    1 hour ago, Matt115 said:

    i remember when i was looking for solution how fix a problem with stalker if good remember and one guy somehow by changing thing broke something in his computer ( i don't have good memory and i'm not IT guy ) so yeah people can do stupid things and then blame Devs

    Sounds like a cool story, I can't imagine what you need to do with the game to permanently damage your PC

    1 hour ago, Matt115 said:

    Sometime ago i guy was complaing that he can't play by 100 players. He didn't know it was private server made by outside company. 

    So i'm maybe too hm... negative but i know that people can do so stupid thing that you can't expect

    This does not justify the lack of settings. And not associated with them. Some person join to a custom server with extraordinary settings and have some problems. And what? Is it time to remove the multiplayer? According to your logic, this should be done to avoid such complaints

     

    If your PC doesn't allow you to comfortably play on ultra settings, you just don't turn them on instead of turning them on and complaining about low fps, right?

  5. 6 minutes ago, Matt115 said:

    Yep, so there will be no chance to increase this into 128 for example.

    Right. It would be more correct to make it possible to enter any value manually. But I have nothing against limits beyond frankly redundant values. So, how does such a limitation invalidate my claim that any conceivable setting can be added, regardless of its impact on performance, given the warning that those setting might cause lag? Also, do you seriously think that performance issues might surprise a player of this game?

  6. 24 minutes ago, Matt115 said:

    Honestly yes and no -  this depends what option do you mean - even increase zombie number can be problematic ( performance etc)...  but descrease or increase zombie health could be easy

    It makes no sense to hide behind thinking through performance problems and so on, because it exists:

    image.png.25d2d21f6afdef8ade7a1201143b9a12.png

    "Chaning this setting has a huge impact on perfomance. Change at your own risk."

  7. 31 minutes ago, Matt115 said:

    you wrote about balance too. So well "content" first balance in "beta"

     

    Adding content is easier than balancing, but nevertheless we see new content once every 1.5 years in a very modest amount. And since there is no balance in the game and, for the reason you mentioned, will not be for many years, it would be logical to give players the opportunity to deal with balancing themselves - by increasing the number of options available when creating a world. I believe that it is orders of magnitude cheaper than creating a new T5 POI or writing NPC AI for most possible settings

  8. 52 minutes ago, Matt115 said:

    Because it is true- i don't remember  how gameplay in cod bo 2 looks but i remember how looks zombie lady in hat in shadow of evil or gasmask soviet soldier zombie on outbreake. so Zombie models matter more that another guns tier / t5 POI :) why? because if you play in L4D2 you don't have feeling you fighting with clone army-  because there is so many variants of zombies

    But I was not talking about new T5 POI and not about weapon tiers, but about simple sliders in the settings menu

  9. 50 minutes ago, Spatch said:

    Including the ability to turn off all traders and adjust starting quests to not say "missing trader" - I am loving the no-trader style of gameplay.

    In its current state, it ruins the gameplay, but if it were possible to customize it, then it would be much more fun with it than without it. Unfortunately looks like TFP believes that game lack new car and zombies models, not replay value or balance.

  10. On 3/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, meganoth said:

     

    And since there is a simple way to generate backpacks I offer the new slogan: "dying to stay alive"

    This should have been the slogan of the game since there were no death penalties in it. Right now death is only a reward, so the game literally says "die to survive"

  11. 13 minutes ago, Star69 said:

    Welcome to the forums. Madmole has replied to this question in the past and he doesn’t see the necessity of adding another ore. Brass has been made plentiful enough from various sources that brass supply shouldn’t be a problem.

    according to this logic, it would be worth deleting the recipe for creating all ammo and weapons, and almost all items in the game

  12. 50 minutes ago, Urban Blackbear said:

     

    Simple. Stop caring about getting them. If getting a bunch of dislikes on a forum post for a game you play as entertainment is the worst thing in your day then how bad can things be?

    The question is not how I perceive the dislike, but that I am fruitless wasting my time to see this dislike. It's like if you get a call on the phone, answer the phone, and hear an advertisement. And it goes on and on

    53 minutes ago, Matt115 said:

    Notification settings

    I don't want to turn off notifications for all reactions, only from spammers. Ignore doesn't, as far as I remember

  13. On 3/22/2022 at 6:57 PM, BFT2020 said:

     

    Not everyone is comfortable voicing their opinions on topics, kuosimodo may just be comfortable using emojis to express their thoughts on the post.

     

    You are also assuming that they have a 2nd account, but no information out there confirms that this is the case.  Sure n2n1 stated that they know who kuosimodo is, but that is hardly confirmation that this is an user with a second account.

     

    If you don't like their reactions, just simply ignore it.  As for the coward comment, why do you need to know who they are?  Do you want to fight them behind school at 3 pm to teach them a lesson on posting negative reactions to your posts?  JUST IGNORE IT.  If you think they are in the wrong, take the high road.  Just ignore their reactions.  Trying to track down who kuosimodo is just to harshly judge their posts to get back at them seems petty to me.

    Wise man, how can I ignore this if I get a notification every time he spams dislikes?

  14. In fact, his dislike spam wouldn't be so annoying if there was an option to not see it in notifications. Every time he spams dislikes you see notifications hoping for some kind of dialogue but instead you see spam negative ratings which of course doesn't make you feel good

  15. 5 hours ago, Alpacko said:

    can we have a zombie spawn multiplier option, like we already have for loot and ai block dmg?

     

    like 2x,3x,4x zombies or 25%-200% zombie spawns.

    "Adding content is honestly the easy part. The hard part is balancing it." so I guess all we'll see is new car/guns/npc's models that took another 1.5 years to complete

  16. Silly video. The author of the video is a typical console player who craves beautiful pictures with a wow effect instead of smart and interesting game mechanics. Zombie AI needs to keep improving, it's much more important than new pixels and models in an already laggy game. Because pictures are what we looked at, got used to and forgot. Zombie AI is something we're dealing with all the time, and AI's flaws hurt more than the lack of pixels

  17. 26 minutes ago, Viktoriusiii said:

    WO there! 🤠

    I really didn't want him to be insulted.
    I disagree with that person on basicially every issue. And I don't think its fair... but no need to call names. Who knows, maybe there is a good reason for this behaviour :)

    I don't see any insult here.

    https://community.7daystodie.com/topic/22366-alpha-20-dev-diary/?do=findComment&comment=449040

  18. On 3/21/2022 at 8:55 AM, Viktoriusiii said:

    Disclaimer: This is not a witchtrial or an attempt at doxxing.
    This is purely speculative fun because this has haunted me basicially ever since 2017 :D
    So if this is considered harrassment or worse doxxing, please delete it immediately.



    Well there isn't an "off-topic" channel, so I'll just theorize here :D
    We are talking about
    https://community.7daystodie.com/profile/33548-kuosimodo/

    An incredibly active user. At least when I am posting stuff.
    Sadly you can not write him/her private messages, otherwise I would have done so already.
    I am pretty sure I have never gotten a thumbs up from him, no matter what I critiqued. I think it all started in A17.
    Basicially everything I posted was downvoted or "PrimeFacepalm"ed by him or it didn't get any reaction.

    He gives answers from a mod an upvote, even if they are factually wrong.
    Also people that defend the game are getting upvotes.

    If there was a counter of how many emotes I got... AT LEAST half of the downvotes and "prime" emotes will be by him.

    He never posts, so it is pretty obvious, that it is a 2nd account of either a mod or Fun Pimp Staff.
    If I was a betting man I'd say it is probably MM himself, because I got to know most of the staff in general discussions pretty well in the years of me @%$#ting on many many stupid changes (many of them actually got changed lateron... so I wasn't even wrong a lot of the time by TFPs staff, even if answers at the time were rejecting my message :D) and I bet he wants to give his opinion, but doesn't want ppl to see that the face of the company just upvotes TFP propaganda xD (Propaganda just meaning positive message about a thing, not necessarily lying)

    I mean I don't know many of the staff, because not a lot are in the general discussions, or I simply haven't interacted with them in the last few years.
    But I can't see any of them doing it... the ones I could see would be Sylen and Gazz, but both just straight up tell you when they disagree :D

     

     

    Anyone wanna try to uncover this conspiracy?
    Who is he/she? What are his/her goals? Are the illuminati behind it?

    Have fun xD
     

    You're not the only one he hates, you can be sure. 

  19. Got 100+ dislikes from kuosimodo at least

    1 hour ago, Morloc said:

     

    Are you sure?

    I'd thought that (without LOtL) your average seed Harvest would equal (.5 * Farm plots) + (2 * Farm Plots)/5 presuming you convert as many crops as you can to seeds.

    For any number of Farm plots, your average Harvest would be lower than your plots indicating unsustainability.

     

     

    -Arch Necromancer Morloc 💀

    Without lotl u get 4 crop + 50% of seed, 1 seed = 5 crop => u got 6.5 crops in average spending 5 crops for seed

     

    Am I wrong? Im not sure now btw 

  20. Just now, Mechanimal said:

    I don't build cheese bases, and I don't care who does either. Who hurt you?

    Then why are you whining?

     

    Speaking of whining, I remember one of the local people who argued that whining on this forum never leads to anything. Now recall that 90% of A20 complaints were related to the new farm, which, by the way, is positive, even without LOTL (for those who are friends with school mathematics). And what do we see

    Quote
    • Living off the Land level 2 now has a 50% chance to harvest 1 additional crop 

    LOL

    So go on to tell how the decrease of durability of blocks hinders to receive aesthetic pleasure, and not to cheat the game (I believe). Maybe the change will be canceled if there are ten more offended cheaters

×
×
  • Create New...