Developer Discussions: Alpha 17

[JaxTeller718]

	<block name="[color="#FFFF00"]TitaniumBlock[/color]">
		<property name="CustomIcon" value="stainlessSteelBlock"/> <property name="CustomIconTint" value="255,255,0"/>		
		<property name="Extends" value="TitaniumMaster"/>
		<property name="SortOrder2" value="0050"/> <!-- SortShape -->
		<property name="DowngradeBlock" value="[color="#FFFF00"]TitaniumBlock[/color]"/>
	</block>

 

Never ever change Royal. I love you just as you are.

[JamesKirk]

Apologies for the pedantry but it's Star Trek.

 

You know you have the Enterprise designation slightly wrong?

 

Maybe, maybe not:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701-A)

Look at the picture

 

EDIT- It's missing a '-' NCC-1701-A is the right name. But it's OT

[The Gronk]

Maybe, maybe not:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701-A)

Look at the picture

 

EDIT- It's missing a '-' NCC-1701-A is the right name. But it's OT

 

From the same wiki page...

"First appearance Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home"

 

Your Kirk avatar is TOS, many years before the destruction of the first Enterprise.

[Space4Ace]

Oh yes. Just recently one was released during Experimental I believe.

 

The best one was on Xmas eve a couple of years ago, at around 8:00 or 9:00pm, when they released an update for A14 or A15 (can't remember which one).

Who else would release an update this late on Xmas eve? Only our good friends from TFP. It was an update on the RWG, which turned out to have bugs, but was still better than the earlier one. There's was a poll asking if we wanted it NOW, or wanted to wait after Xmas... NOW won!

I will always remember this as one of the best gifts ever given by TFP... That's dedication!

 

Edit: It was A13.6 actually. Here's the link: https://7daystodie.com/forums/showthread.php?36423-Alpha-13-6-Patch-is-out!&p=371698&viewfull=1#post371698

 

It was probably around 7:00 or 8:00pm TFP time (haha!) since it was 8:00 or 9:00pm here EST time.

[Kattla]

That is a design decision, so not sure how that would land. Is end game goal that my mega base of best materials should passively stop all zombies while I take a nap? You can already do that with enough concrete and traps, but where is the line for how difficult that should be to create? In A16 it always felt too easy to get to that point. In A17 it is harder. More settings may be the solution to allow people to tweak that line how they want.

 

Could it be tied with the difficulty setting perhaps? In a much higher degree then it is

today.

So, easist: Yes, you could almost go afk with only passive defense.

medium: About A16 levels.

hard: As of current A17 , but have to see how the AI improvement plays out.

[HerrKingsley]

That is a design decision, so not sure how that would land. Is end game goal that my mega base of best materials should passively stop all zombies while I take a nap? You can already do that with enough concrete and traps, but where is the line for how difficult that should be to create? In A16 it always felt too easy to get to that point. In A17 it is harder. More settings may be the solution to allow people to tweak that line how they want.

 

Thats true it is an design decision. And I think a pretty important one to figure out.

The way I see it is you could:

 

1. See every attempt to not fight zombies on horde night "cheesing", And try to fix it.

2. Allow bases to be unbreachable, but not balancing the cost so that there would be no way to repair the damage by next BM (This would mostly apply to SP)

3. Making the top tire materials unbreachable or easily repaired.

4. Balancing ammunition cost for turrets so they can defend a BM and be filled up to the next one.

 

If 1&2 are true. I think we will start seeing more BM combat bunkers, away from the real base. Because there would be no purpose of building a base with bad ass protection since it would be to costly to repair in time for next bm.

The combat bunkers would basically function as a stationary temporary armor.

 

If 3&4 are true. It would give endgame or top tire material a real purpose.

On the other hand we might also see some BM combat bunkers with Lower tire materials for those who wants to go 1 on 1 with the zombies. Or maybe they will decide to put points in other perks than top tire materials?

 

Im not sure more settings are necessary. I mean If I want to have a harder play through Im not going to build a 20x concrete wall filled with turrets and then complain about zombies not breaching.

Ill strip down butt naked and face those bloody dead heads with my FISTS!!!

 

And a side note: "take a nap" is not what I think the ppl who are voicing these opinions are doing. Mining, building, cooking, repairing. Basically playing your game is what I bet they are doing.

"taking a nap" and logging out is what i think ppl WILL do if no place is coincided safe....Well AFK is

[Lonestarcanuck]

Was the Gracie (Bob's Boar mean & Carl's Corn) removed from B240? we can't find it on our map. usually in small town.

[beerfly]

So, I played Navez for a few days and it is my 5th (I mean it) time playing it since A11.

 

Boys, I mean Pimps, you would better put some awesome soundtrack, much more awesome than Galaxy News Radio. We wanna have the best soundtrack for a game here. Thank you

[Sam_Neill]

I was wondering about turrets and why there is no NPC Turret versions yet, that will attack players.

 

Some Survivors (or bandits) could set up some of those as trap (like the mines) and players woud have to be aware of them or sneak around.

You would only need another turret block thats targetting player(s) and cannot be controlled and needs no ammo.

 

Would maybe tend to people using them to remove zombies as well, maybe kind of exploiting them (building the player base "behind" such a turret). Maybe avoidable if the ammo is limited only.

 

Well, just throwing thoughts into the pool of replies :-)

[stasis78]

I was wondering about turrets and why there is no NPC Turret versions yet, that will attack players.

 

Some Survivors (or bandits) could set up some of those as trap (like the mines) and players woud have to be aware of them or sneak around.

You would only need another turret block thats targetting player(s) and cannot be controlled and needs no ammo.

 

Would maybe tend to people using them to remove zombies as well, maybe kind of exploiting them (building the player base "behind" such a turret).

 

Well, just throwing thoughts into the pool of replies :-)

 

Bandits were cut on a17.

[Sam_Neill]

Bandits were cut on a17.

 

Im not talking about bandits, but possible turret placement, left behind in POIs, which attack players and/or zombies (bandits only mentioned for a storyline/reason for their placement).

[M1kkelangelo]

Is the Tool and die set for A17 available at all? I cant find a recipe for it whichever tech tree i advance in.

[The Gronk]

Is the Tool and die set for A17 available at all? I cant find a recipe for it whichever tech tree i advance in.

 

There is no recipe. You must find them while scavenging or buy them from a trader.

[rewtgr]

Is the Tool and die set for A17 available at all? I cant find a recipe for it whichever tech tree i advance in.

 

Loot or trader

[JamesKirk]

It is, but not craftable

 

EDIT: 3 replies in one minute LOL

[JaxTeller718]

Im not talking about bandits, but possible turret placement, left behind in POIs, which attack players and/or zombies (bandits only mentioned for a storyline/reason for their placement).

 

I love the idea but oh my god can you imagine the level of "I'm never playing this game again" type of posts we would see if a digging zombie is worth a thousand salty tears?

[faatal]

FAATAL, I know mod talk is kind of ot for this thread, but it's the only way to get your ear.

 

Kell managed to get all the old uma zombies working in a17, well over 100 community created zombies.

 

For performance reasons you do need to turn the uma texture res down, but performance is pretty much the same as vanilla with that setting.

 

There are some new zombie properties the old uma zombies don't have, and I was hoping maybe you could find the time to add the properties to the uma zombies?...

 

I have never looked at the UMA zombies, but my guess is that the main problems you mention are with prefabs. Zombie/animal prefabs have some changes like a large entity blocker GameObject was added. There may be layer differences. Anim controller states and scripts have changed quite a bit. The old stuff would have to be diffed and adapted, which I won't spend time on.

[faatal]

You got that in? Well done! (no sarcasm intended) :-)

 

I'm curious if it only allows for jumping or also allows for direct pathing over vertical and inverted surfaces?

 

Links are made in a horizontal direction, but with height variance, so it works on a slope, but once too steep it assumes you cannot walk it and does not link. A vertical surface is not pathable, unless it is a drop of a reasonable distance, then it just links down. It does not path along ceilings. The more nodes, the slower it gets and more memory used.

[faatal]

Thats true it is an design decision. And I think a pretty important one to figure out.

 

I bring it up, because I am not a designer. I program. Sure I design stuff as I program, but I don't make the final call. Some of my stuff is left as is, when the team likes it, but other things are changed if deemed too easy/hard/weird/confusing/whatever. Designers/management/owners make the final call in your typical game team.

 

The way I see it is you could:

 

1. See every attempt to not fight zombies on horde night "cheesing", And try to fix it.

2. Allow bases to be unbreachable, but not balancing the cost so that there would be no way to repair the damage by next BM (This would mostly apply to SP)

3. Making the top tire materials unbreachable or easily repaired.

4. Balancing ammunition cost for turrets so they can defend a BM and be filled up to the next one.

 

If 1&2 are true. I think we will start seeing more BM combat bunkers, away from the real base. Because there would be no purpose of building a base with bad ass protection since it would be to costly to repair in time for next bm.

The combat bunkers would basically function as a stationary temporary armor.

 

If 3&4 are true. It would give endgame or top tire material a real purpose.

On the other hand we might also see some BM combat bunkers with Lower tire materials for those who wants to go 1 on 1 with the zombies. Or maybe they will decide to put points in other perks than top tire materials?

 

Im not sure more settings are necessary. I mean If I want to have a harder play through Im not going to build a 20x concrete wall filled with turrets and then complain about zombies not breaching.

Ill strip down butt naked and face those bloody dead heads with my FISTS!!!

 

And a side note: "take a nap" is not what I think the ppl who are voicing these opinions are doing. Mining, building, cooking, repairing. Basically playing your game is what I bet they are doing.

"taking a nap" and logging out is what i think ppl WILL do if no place is coincided safe....Well AFK is

 

Designers will decide how they want that to behave in the default gameplay settings. I and other team members are thinking an AI block damage multiplier setting might be all that is needed to cater to those who don't like the default. It is on my todo list.

[The Gronk]

Links are made in a horizontal direction, but with height variance, so it works on a slope, but once too steep it assumes you cannot walk it and does not link. A vertical surface is not pathable, unless it is a drop of a reasonable distance, then it just links down. It does not path along ceilings. The more nodes, the slower it gets and more memory used.

 

I know the pain of A* well, I've written it from scratch a few times (which is why I'm amazed you used it). It looks like I'll have to do it again to use the new job system in unity.

 

Have you considered declaring no nodes at all for the node map? Just having everything on a virtual grid with cells only set if they are to be used?

 

It should be a little easier on memory for the minimal trade-off of having to set the weight of the node during pathfinding. Given the underlying voxel engine I have little doubt there are fast helper functions to get a blocks properties quickly.

 

Updated: I'm pretty drunk so I'll add that if I can make A* pathfind over 500,000 km to an accuracy of 500m at runtime* you can do 3d pathfinding within a 0.5 km radius :-)

 

* the trick for that is to use layered smaller grids instead of a single large grid.

[stasis78]

Im not talking about bandits, but possible turret placement, left behind in POIs, which attack players and/or zombies (bandits only mentioned for a storyline/reason for their placement).

 

Why would this happen before bandits? Did it ever come up as a thing from TFP?

 

You are conflating ideas from what is supposed to be with what you want.

[The Gronk]

Why would this happen before bandits? Did it ever come up as a thing from TFP?

 

The bandits/survivors may have set them up before dying.

 

"We triggered a dead man's trap"

Royce : Predators

[stasis78]

The bandits/survivors may have set them up before dying.

 

"We triggered a dead man's trap"

Royce : Predators

 

:facepalm:

 

- - - Updated - - -

 

I want bandits before stupid sentry traps thanks.

[faatal]

Have you considered declaring no nodes at all for the node map? Just having everything on a virtual grid with cells only set if they are to be used?

 

It should be a little easier on memory for the minimal trade-off of having to set the weight of the node during pathfinding. Given the underlying voxel engine I have little doubt there are fast helper functions to get a blocks properties quickly.

 

It is a layered grid, with layers allocated as needed. Normal links are just a byte in a struct, not an allocation. Custom links are a ref, but are used sparingly. Memory use is fine as it is. Cost calculations are not cheap since 2 blocks are looked at. It would be at least 50x slower to calc the cost vs using a precomputed value. Memory use is a factor, but not the prime concern. Raycasts and block analysis are the biggest overhead.

[The Gronk]

Memory use is a factor, but not the prime concern. Raycasts and block analysis are the biggest overhead.

 

Did you find the job system function for mass raycasts? Are/have you considered using it?

 

https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/RaycastCommand.html