Jump to content

Alpha 18 Dev Diary!!


madmole

Alpha 18 Dev Diary!!  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Alpha 18 Dev Diary!!

    • A18 Stable is Out!
      2
    • :)
      1


Recommended Posts

Sounds good. Hopefully loot lists are a little less generous when it comes to high end things items such as guns - you already know that the more available something is...

 

Books will create more exploration incentives and randomize playthroughs a little, but definitely not to the degree of the old major recipe books. Might consider some more RNG fluctuations, when it comes to tech, while having a very expensive alternative way to get essential things (much like you kind of did with vehicles).

 

As for me, I anticipate the fixes to the root motion more than anything. Not being able to always avoid zombies will return that urgency which will really create the need to use core parts of the game, such as the "tower defense". It's a shame when core parts of the game don't have strong incentives behind them and are essentially optional. Sometimes the freedom of choice, eliminates more content/replayability/options than it creates.

 

We're workong on making the guns use the loot templates so there is a decent chance to get a gun of any class instead of pistols, shotties and hunting rifles being the norm, and hopefully stop the flow of eternal brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wooden bow is now "primitive bow" and it sucks pretty bad.

 

So if I want to use the bow for hunting and killing zombies then it is best to find a compound bow as early as possible ?

 

With the feather nerf hunting is more challenging but you can one shot with a hunting rifle for sure to the head.

 

I have a feather delivery system. It's called a vulture and flies reliably towards me when I'm sitting on the bike :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unarmed combat, a great start.

 

 

You know it seems that the best weapon to use at the start of the game is your fist. Punching seems faster and more effective than things like the stone ax. Plus it feels more like combat than most melee weapons do. You also don't have to worry about suddenly not being able to swing if your weapon breaks during combat. Your fist never do.

 

Just keep in mind that your left is faster while the right hits harder but uses more stamina. Not counting the power punches.

 

I find it best to fight opening up with fast punches and then hitting them with the right when they are down. But other combinations work well to.

 

Another thing that I noticed is the amount of detail that goes into the punch. If you look closely you will notice that the arm and hand seem to twist as you punch. This detail most likely goes unnoticed by most but is really cool to see.

 

 

The next time you start a new game, you should try punching and see if it works for you.

 

My MMA training proved useful in giving the animator good direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if I want to use the bow for hunting and killing zombies then it is best to find a compound bow as early as possible ?

 

 

 

I have a feather delivery system. It's called a vulture and flies reliably towards me when I'm sitting on the bike :)

 

Its best to find a bow with the stats you want. There is primitive, wooden and compound. I've found better wooden bows than compound, randoms stats are cool.

 

Yes but you will still feel the nerf. I'm doing my agility build now and you run out of arrows if you don't switch it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its best to find a bow with the stats you want. There is primitive, wooden and compound. I've found better wooden bows than compound, randoms stats are cool.

 

Yes but you will still feel the nerf. I'm doing my agility build now and you run out of arrows if you don't switch it up.

 

At the risk of making it sound like I'm asking for it to be too easy again, is there a reason there's no alternate - or maybe an advanced arrow - that you can make with polymer scraps? Not much fletching these days is actually made using feathers - it's mostly rubberized plastic and the like.

 

Oh, and while I'm here, on the meat amounts. Is there a technical reason you went to 5 meats versus simply "20/40/60/80/100% chance to spawn a second meat on harvest" for the hunter perk? I've always wondered that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of making it sound like I'm asking for it to be too easy again, is there a reason there's no alternate - or maybe an advanced arrow - that you can make with polymer scraps? Not much fletching these days is actually made using feathers - it's mostly rubberized plastic and the like.

 

Oh, and while I'm here, on the meat amounts. Is there a technical reason you went to 5 meats versus simply "20/40/60/80/100% chance to spawn a second meat on harvest" for the hunter perk? I've always wondered that.

 

That is the reason. It's 20/40/50/80/100% MORE on harvest. (so 1-5 extra) No half meats here.

:D

 

Oh, and MM: yer still a youngster! ( *MY* lawn is a minefield.... heh-heh-heh) :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its best to find a bow with the stats you want. There is primitive, wooden and compound. I've found better wooden bows than compound, randoms stats are cool.

 

Yes but you will still feel the nerf. I'm doing my agility build now and you run out of arrows if you don't switch it up.

 

Is there a tradeoff between something like damage and durability?

Such that higher damage weapons will roll a lower durability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, and while I'm here, on the meat amounts. Is there a technical reason you went to 5 meats versus simply "20/40/60/80/100% chance to spawn a second meat on harvest" for the hunter perk? I've always wondered that.

 

(with apologies to canadianbluebeer... is it REALLY BLUE?)

 

As MM has stated a couple time previously, 1 'meat' would muck up the perk system. Lvl 1 = 20% more, Lvl 2 = 40% more, etc. What kind of impact would that have for 1 meat?

 

How about yoiu think of meat differently? Rather than 1 meat, or 1 pound or kilogram or whatever, why not ounces? or any kind of factor of something smaller? 1 meat could represent 4 ounces.

 

The actual real world quantity doesn't even matter. (Game design triumphs over realism...) What matters is how the items and their quantities represent 'in game' different game play mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why nerf the bow?

 

It's not like it had a lot of power to begin with. Some of the stronger zombies look like a Porcupine by the time they dropped.

 

It was not on par with tier 1 primitive weapons and was outclassing pistols with relatively zero effort stone arrows. If you specialize in archery you'll do fine with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a tradeoff between something like damage and durability?

Such that higher damage weapons will roll a lower durability?

 

Its random, so absolutely. If your lucky you'll find high damage and high durability, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(with apologies to canadianbluebeer... is it REALLY BLUE?)

 

As MM has stated a couple time previously, 1 'meat' would muck up the perk system. Lvl 1 = 20% more, Lvl 2 = 40% more, etc. What kind of impact would that have for 1 meat?

 

How about yoiu think of meat differently? Rather than 1 meat, or 1 pound or kilogram or whatever, why not ounces? or any kind of factor of something smaller? 1 meat could represent 4 ounces.

 

The actual real world quantity doesn't even matter. (Game design triumphs over realism...) What matters is how the items and their quantities represent 'in game' different game play mechanics.

 

Yes, its a bite, not a full hamburger which is 5 meat. We needed to make everything granular so it could scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 meat... Any plans for animal farm or animal lure?

Its definitely not a kickstarter goal, but could be a sweet endgame thing...

 

It's been said animal farms would take up too many computer resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its random, so absolutely. If your lucky you'll find high damage and high durability, etc.

 

Weird question, but is this principle going to apply to the new sub biomes? Like you're lucky find a place that has few zombies, rich resources, nice temperture, good farm-ability, and lots of animals all at the same time?

 

--EDIT--

Never mind, a clearer way to ask the question would be whether the sub-biome types are handcrafted or procedurally generated, and I'm pretty sure it still handcrafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you aren't using enough. Stone axe got a decent buff. I usually put 4 rows around my entire base 7x7 the first horde and that takes care of quite a few zeds. My fort I play with 16 zombies alive on horde nights. I'll add a 2 high row on day 14.

 

On this subject, while I totally agree with you that spikes aren't useless, don't you think that a base with 4 rows of spikes (to start, might get to 10!) looks a bit silly?

 

I think you could achieve the same balance by making each individual spike costlier (in materials and in time) than they are now, but also more durable. That way, you spend the same materials for a single row of spikes than you do now for four of them, but they are just as effective as the four rows and you don't have a base that ends up looking like a huge sea of spikes.

 

This would also discourage crafting spikes on the fly as a means to kill pursuing zombies, since each spike would cost more materials and take more time to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this subject, while I totally agree with you that spikes aren't useless, don't you think that a base with 4 rows of spikes (to start, might get to 10!) looks a bit silly?

 

I think you could achieve the same balance by making each individual spike costlier (in materials and in time) than they are now, but also more durable. That way, you spend the same materials for a single row of spikes than you do now for four of them, but they are just as effective as the four rows and you don't have a base that ends up looking like a huge sea of spikes.

 

This would also discourage crafting spikes on the fly as a means to kill pursuing zombies, since each spike would cost more materials and take more time to make.

 

People would STILL do four rows even though they were more powerful and we would still have bases with four rows of spikes but way OP compared to now.

 

The way to discourage crafting spikes on the fly to kill pursuing zombies is to make them be a single post that does no damage and then using an upgrade tool you have to stand there and upgrade them to wood spikes that do the damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this subject, while I totally agree with you that spikes aren't useless, don't you think that a base with 4 rows of spikes (to start, might get to 10!) looks a bit silly?

 

I think you could achieve the same balance by making each individual spike costlier (in materials and in time) than they are now, but also more durable. That way, you spend the same materials for a single row of spikes than you do now for four of them, but they are just as effective as the four rows and you don't have a base that ends up looking like a huge sea of spikes.

 

This would also discourage crafting spikes on the fly as a means to kill pursuing zombies, since each spike would cost more materials and take more time to make.

 

only 10 rows?? snicker. try 40 or 50 rows worth. been there, done that. (A16) we had a path to get in, zeds too stupid to use.

Can't do that now as they would use it. That be bad.

 

(I'm up to 11 rows right now, and expanding. (barbed wire fence after 3 of spikes, repeat)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People would STILL do four rows even though they were more powerful and we would still have bases with four rows of spikes but way OP compared to now.

 

The way to discourage crafting spikes on the fly to kill pursuing zombies is to make them be a single post that does no damage and then using an upgrade tool you have to stand there and upgrade them to wood spikes that do the damage.

 

I mean, sure, if people want to go overboard and spend hundreds of thousands of wood and iron into making however many rows of spikes make them feel safe, you can't stop them. But you can deter them from doing so. There should be such a thing as overkill (i.e. when putting more spikes will not help you any further). This is usually handled in games by having some specific enemies that have certain abilities that make them ignore whatever type of defense you are pointlessly spamming (vultures... vultures dropping zombies... demolishers blowing them up when they get killed by them...).

 

Point being, they can already go overkill on them. Sure, they'd still be able to go overkill with this change. But at least a sufficient amount of spikes wouldn't look silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, its a bite, not a full hamburger which is 5 meat. We needed to make everything granular so it could scale.

 

Wouldn't it make more sense to have the hunting perk give increments of +100% and recipes use 1 meat to maintain granularity? As it is now, it's awfully un-intuitive for a new player to have 3 meat and not be able to cook it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...